by Sarah Marchetti
Category: Digital Influence
Saturday evening, a discussion criticizing a new Motrin commercial aimed at moms exploded on Twitter. I’m not going to rehash the entire situation since plenty of mom bloggers and PR and marketing people have already written about it. But in short, moms on Twitter started discussing a Motrin commercial that they found condescending and offensive regarding wearing your baby in a sling or wrap on your body. This discussion quickly grew to thousands of tweets, spawning its own hashtag, #motrinmoms, and became the top Twitter search for the weekend. There’s even a YouTube video made by Katja Presnal that shows the negative tweets interspersed with pictures of moms wearing their babies in carriers. McNeil Consumer Healthcare, the makers of Motrin, had a full-blown communications crisis on their hands by early Sunday morning.
In a social media crisis, the medium you use to respond to the situation can make or break how severe the crisis turns out to be since communities can be fragmented. Plus, social media is all about community and starting up a conversation so you should respond to the crisis where it is currently happening. At the time of this post, McNeil’s VP of Marketing, Kathy Widmer, has started replying via e-mail to bloggers who posted about the Motrin ads with a very nice note apologizing for the ad and assuring the moms that they take consumer feedback very seriously and will pull the ads as soon as they can. I think this is a great first response and fairly timely, but McNeil needs to go further with their crisis response first thing tomorrow morning using social media to address this social media crisis. What should they do?
Using these medium-specific tatics, along with commenting and continuing to reach out to bloggers, should help mitigate this crisis quickly by reaching the people talking about this crisis where they already are. Of course, the advice for next time would be to establish a social media presence ahead of time to prime yourself to respond, especially when your target audience is moms. The mom blogosphere is very powerful and vocal. Brands would be wise to participate in the conversation long before a crisis.
Compassion in Hong Kong
November 17th, 2008 at 8:01 am
This seems to be one of those classic situations where a group of men and a group of women (women who either have never been pregnant or don’t use the carrying device in question) worked directly on this campaign.
The piece was very condescending; this coming from a man! Situations like these are easily accounted for … just simply have a test base of the target audience, the “moms”; show that test base the piece and get reaction.
Often times people take the web for granted, thinking that everything can be put up without traditional testing and modified quickly and easily. I am unaware of the agency behind the creative strategy, but I suspect it was not Motrin’s traditional agency but instead a “new media’ agency that put this together — one that forgets the message and focuses too much on the “conversation”.
November 17th, 2008 at 9:15 am
Martin- Actually the campaign was TV, print and online, so it isn’t a case of slapping something on the internet. Several sources have said that Taxi is the agency of record for Motrin. They are a full service advertising agency. I think that the concept of it could have worked, but the execution was poor. They were trying to sympathize with moms, but the tone just didn’t come off right and was condescending instead of “in the know”. They didn’t capture that insiders view of a mom’s life that they were going for.
November 17th, 2008 at 12:19 pm
Companies can contact Twitter and work with them to claim their brand’s name if it has already been taken, specially if it has sabotaged and it’s being used for making jokes and negative comments. I believe Biz Stone, the co-founder of Twitter, has helped a colleague with this issue before. His Twitter handle is @biz.
November 17th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
Thanks Yianni. That’s helpful information.
November 17th, 2008 at 3:12 pm
I think these responses are so “careful,” and will be ignored by such a vocal group because they are still relatively impersonal and “from the brand”.
Yeah, ok, apologize, but it seems so impersonal. Also, telling us that you’re parents too seems somewhat disingenuous. You’re trying to sell product, and that will cloud your thinking, even if you are a baby-wearing mom or dad. Create a consumer council? Maybe. How about a Friendfeed room, ala the Pepsi Cooler, to get feedback AND stimulate discussion in a more streamlined environment? How about instead of freaking out, instilling some kind of sense of humor? How about if the folks at Motrin stop taking themselves so seriously and poke some fun at themselves?
November 18th, 2008 at 10:25 am
Robin- I disagree that the tactics are careful. For a brand that doesn’t have a social media presence, getting a Twitter handle and joining the conversation would be quite revolutionary. The brand issued a press release and sent e-mails to bloggers as their crisis communication strategy. This doesn’t reach people where they are reading about the issue except in the case when bloggers post their response as an addendum to their post on the issue. If someone stumbles across, this on Twitter, YouTube or Google, the brand should ensure that their response is right there next to the negative information. Makes it easy for people to see that the corporation’s point of view on the issue without losing their attention. I do agree with you that using a sense of humor could be helpful in their response.
February 5th, 2009 at 12:55 pm
[...] with the Motrin Moms crisis a few months back, the reaction against Suleman shows that a social media community can amplify [...]
January 7th, 2010 at 3:21 pm
[...] emphasis on Social Media crises is focused towards large brands – JetBlue, United, Motrin etc., and there’s plenty of them. But what about the small local business? You’ll have [...]