by Ian Sohn
Category: Digital Reputation

I’ve been thinking and writing a lot lately about the power the “vocal minority” exert in social media. I know it’s not a new phenomenon, but I’m still fascinated at the seismic shift it’s causing in the brand-consumer power dynamic. And it’s not all cake and balloons.
The latest dust-up that has me back on my soapbox has to do with ESPN. Last week it was rumored - based on a single vague Tweet from an ESPN reporter - that ESPN had enacted a draconian social media policy. Some of the most influential bloggers in all of bloggerville rushed to wag their finger at the network. Tsk Tsk they said.
Big problem though - no one (by their own admission) had actually seen ESPN’s policy at the time they were passing some incredibly harsh judgment. So this “reporting” was based on, um … [crickets].
By the time ESPN actually released the policy, countless numbers had blindly re-tweeted and propagated the negative POV, based solely on the uninformed opinions of others. In fact two days after ESPN released the policy, I heard someone say “ESPN blocks social networks.” Wrong, misinformed and damaging to a brand that did nothing wrong.
Funny thing happened on the way to the forum … turns out the policy was, for the most part, pretty reasonable. But clearly the point of this post is not about arguing the merits of the fine print. You can see the policy here and decide for yourself.
Yet another tempest in the teapot. The vocal minority strikes again.
Can’t we all just get along? What is with this rush to judgment? And why the snarkiness? Why not a rush to truth? Isn’t the culture of cruelty era over and done?
I have no allusions of changing the dialogue, or even the tone. But I can do my own small part. So here are five rules by which I’ll behave moving forward … think you’ve got it in you?
[this post is edited from the original that appeared on my personal blog]
Crossing the Pond Working with the Media in the UK and USA
August 10th, 2009 at 10:01 pm
Such the truth in what you say. This space has definitely made us more vocal and created a sort of ’sanctity’ that certain groups feel they need to protect when brands aren’t doing it the way they think it should be done (Motrin Moms comes to mind).
It’s easy for many of us to get sucked into the wave of criticism, but better off to take a step back and assess the situation and ‘controversy’ before you add to the storm.
Thanks for the reminder, Ian.
August 12th, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Great advice. Now if we can just get others to listen. I think the anonymity (perceived or not) of this type of media allows people to say/post things they might think a little bit harder about doing otherwise.
August 12th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Thanks Sonny and Crystal.
Crystal, your comment reminded me of a post I wrote a few weeks ago about anonymous commenters. You should check it out. http://tinyurl.com/kjkepf
August 13th, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Okay. You’ve got me there. Good point.
August 25th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Great post and points. This issue just came up in discussion yesterday - whether people read before they re/tweet or share, or if the ever-present mob of torch-bearing villagers are starting to infest social media too. Hope your 5 rules take hold!