by Will Robinson
Category: Best Practices, Digital Influence, Events, How-To, Measurement
People hate Google Sidewiki. It’s an ugly word, but people hate Google Sidewiki. The internet is filled with frustration, angst, and incredulity of people who want to know a.) how to get rid of it and b.) how a company with a “Don’t Be Evil” mantra can look at themselves in the mirror after developing something that is so inarguably evil.
I love Google Sidewiki. It mixes the brand engagement of a Facebook Fan Page with the free speech of Twitter. I can now go to a brand’s website and tell future visitors how much I love a brand or how I think it could be better (constructive and fair, of course). If you had Google Sidewiki you could see how I recently sucked up to not only my boss, but also my boss’s boss. It’s great.
If this is your first time hearing the words “Google Sidewiki” I will let Google quickly explain: “Google Sidewiki is a browser sidebar that lets you contribute and read information alongside any web page.” That’s right. People can now contribute “information” alongside your webpage. The secret is that you have to download Google Sidewiki as a toolbar before you can read that information or write any of your own. Google is quick to point out that sidewiki is being used in all sorts of productive ways. As you might imagine, it’s also being used in some not so productive ways. Although there is a steady drumbeat to ban, opt-out or kill sidewiki, it looks like it’s here to stay.
With that in mind, I’m here to help you embrace sidewiki and keep you from getting bit when you do. Here are five best practices to be successful:
1. Create a webmaster post on your homepage’s sidewiki. This post will always be at the top of the sidewiki allowing you to greet sidewiki users and provide tips on your site’s offerings, special features and navigation. It’s the door to your website and a chance to decorate a little.
2. Use negative posts as an opportunity to address a concern or problem. Twitter is cornering the Social CRM market, but your sidewiki offers the same opportunity. Sometimes complaining is just complaining, but if you approach your sidewiki as an ongoing focus group you’ll benefit.
3. Use positive comments as an opportunity to nurture brand enthusiasts. These people are knocking on your front door while serving as ambassadors for other site visitors. Share their post and cultivate them as you would a blogger who just wrote a glowing review.
4. Avoid rating a sidewiki entry down (or up). Sidewiki entries rise and fall depending on other user’s ratings. You’re not a “user,” you’re the subject matter. Follow Wikipedia best practices here. It can be hard to sit on your hands, but you place your credibility in jeopardy when you start interjecting your opinion.
5. Do not create fake Google accounts and seed positive comments on your sidewiki or negative comments on your competitor’s. This should go without saying, but it’s too important not to. The internet is filled with sad stories of people who did not heed this advice. It’s not worth it.
Okay, let me have it. My feelings can’t be hurt any more knowing that “SidewikiSux” has more Twitter followers than me.
Interview with Twitter Fail Whale Designer
January 18th, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Some very good points Will. If you look past the SideWiki hatred (amongst webmasters) the end-users are asking how to install, and how do I use it. (Search on Twitter for SideWiki to get the real vibe for SW).
It’s no secret that the best businesses now have an “engage” policy with regards to their products and services. The webmasters that fear SideWiki to the point where they install blockers on their pages, will be spending more and more time doing that because SideWiki is just the beginning.
If your online business is not “in” with social media, then you will simply be scrutinized even more by hiding behind the market truths, whether good or bad. Users will be more inclined to wonder why you aren’t connected, than what you have to offer them.
January 18th, 2010 at 1:31 pm
Thanks for your comment, Marty. I agree, we’ll look back and see that we are very much in the nascent stages of customer/brand engagement.
January 21st, 2010 at 9:46 am
Will you’ve made some very good points. Personally, I think SideWiki is an opportunity to engage with our clients. In the end, those who “hate” SideWiki are going to be kicking themselves when it becomes standard. Much like those who were against social media. I think a large part behind the argument against SideWiki is people don’t like change, especially changes that have the potential to change best practices.
January 28th, 2010 at 3:40 pm
[...] of success/failure for the Sidewiki (including Mashable, TechCrunch, Jeff Jarvis at BuzzMachine, Ogilvy PR, etc.) but we wanted to look at where it is today and where it might [...]
June 13th, 2010 at 4:07 am
I love Sidewiki myself as well, it seemed like the WAY to do social web. Fully integrated with each website, and yet apart from them. Not tangled up with my “personal” social network either like with facebook, etc.
Yet, it looks like google is leaving it to die on the vine. No promotion whatsoever. I look at the lonely sidewiki icon (all I get in Chrome, not a full sidebar), and see that sidewiki comments are few and far between. The pages that have them rarely get new ones.
I guess this was not meant to be.
July 31st, 2010 at 8:50 am
thanks for the wonderful article..it is helpful